constitutional-ai
Anthropic's method for training harmless AI through self-improvement. Two-phase approach - supervised learning with self-critique/revision, then RLAIF (RL from AI Feedback). Use for safety alignment, reducing harmful outputs without human labels. Powers Claude's safety system.
peer-review
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
code-review
Code review skill for analyzing code quality, detecting bugs, and ensuring best practices. Provides comprehensive code review with actionable feedback. Use proactively when user requests code review, quality check, or bug detection. Triggers: code review, review code, check code, analyze code, bug detection, 코드 리뷰, 코드 검토, 버그 검사, コードレビュー, バグ検出, 代码审查, 代码检查, revisión de código, revisar código, detección de errores, revue de code, réviser le code, détection de bugs, Code-Review, Code überprüfen, Fehlererkennung, revisione del codice, rivedere codice, rilevamento bug Do NOT use for: design document creation, deployment tasks, or gap analysis (use phase-8-review).
phase-8-review
Skill for verifying overall codebase quality and gap analysis. Covers architecture consistency, convention compliance, design-implementation gaps, and potential issue detection. Includes analysis patterns and report writing. Use proactively when implementation is complete and quality verification is needed. Triggers: code review, architecture review, quality check, refactoring, gap analysis, 코드 리뷰, 설계-구현 분석, コードレビュー, ギャップ分析, 代码审查, 差距分析, revisión de código, revisión de arquitectura, control de calidad, análisis de brechas, revue de code, revue d'architecture, contrôle qualité, analyse des écarts, Code-Review, Architekturüberprüfung, Qualitätskontrolle, Gap-Analyse, revisione del codice, revisione dell'architettura, controllo qualità, analisi dei gap Do NOT use for: initial development, design phase, or deployment tasks.
pdbe-api
Query the PDBe (Protein Data Bank in Europe) REST API and Solr search API from within Coot to access structure metadata, validation data, revision history, and search capabilities
sequential-thinking
Performs dynamic, reflective problem-solving through iterative thought chains. Use for complex planning requiring revision, branching, backtracking, or hypothesis verification. Ideal for multi-step analysis where context maintenance is required or the full scope isn't initially clear.
sequential-thinking
Systematic step-by-step reasoning with revision and branching. Use for complex problems, multi-stage analysis, design planning, problem decomposition, or encountering unclear scope, alternative approaches needed, revision requirements.
sequential-thinking
Apply structured, reflective problem-solving for complex tasks requiring multi-step analysis, revision capability, and hypothesis verification. Use for complex problem decomposition, adaptive planning, analysis needing course correction, problems with unclear scope, multi-step solutions, and hypothesis-driven work.
contract-review
Contract review skill that adds comment-based issue annotations without changing original text. Enforces a three-layer review (basic, business, legal), writes structured comments (issue type, risk reason, revision suggestion) with risk level encoded via reviewer name, and generates a contract summary, consolidated opinion, and Mermaid business flowchart (with rendered image). Output language must follow the contract’s language.
Submittal Tracker
Track construction submittals through the review process. Manage approvals, revisions, and compliance.
As-Built Tracker
Track as-built documentation and record drawings. Monitor submission status, manage revisions, and ensure completeness for handover.
huashu-article-edit
Standardized article editing workflow that ensures the scope of changes is clear, progress is trackable, and revisions are recorded. Use this skill when the user says "edit the article", "modify the article", "adjust the content", or "change this piece."
crucible-editor
Revision and editing assistant for Crucible-drafted novels. Use when author has completed a first draft and wants to revise, edit, or polish their manuscript. Handles developmental editing, line editing, copy editing, and final polish. Triggers on "edit my novel," "revise chapter X," "polish my manuscript," "help me edit," or when user has completed draft chapters and wants to improve them.
phab
Use phab CLI for Phabricator task management, code review workflows, revision creation and updates, with Git integration and auto-detection features.
apr
Run APR (Automated Plan Reviser) workflow for FCP specification refinement. Use when asked to run APR, revision rounds, spec review, integrate GPT feedback, or harmonize docs. Handles Oracle remote setup, running rounds, integrating feedback, and syncing README/implementation docs.
bayesian-reasoning-calibration
Use when making predictions or judgments under uncertainty and need to explicitly update beliefs with new evidence. Invoke when forecasting outcomes, evaluating probabilities, testing hypotheses, calibrating confidence, assessing risks with uncertain data, or avoiding overconfidence bias. Use when user mentions priors, likelihoods, Bayes theorem, probability updates, forecasting, calibration, or belief revision.
interactive-writing-assistant
This skill provides comprehensive support for the writing process from ideation through revision. Use this skill when helping users write essays, articles, or creative pieces through interactive collaboration. The skill supports co-evolving outline and prose, voice-based input processing, multiple writing styles, and connection to the user's PKM system for enriched content.
weekly-newsletter
Genera la newsletter semanal de DevExpert recopilando contenido de X, YouTube, Postiz y bookmarks. Crea borrador en Listmonk para revisión.
revision
Guide the edit pass after drafting. Use when revision feels overwhelming, when changes cascade unpredictably, when you can't see problems anymore, or when editing never ends.
story-sense
Diagnose what any story needs regardless of its current state. This skill should be used when a writer is stuck, evaluating story problems, when narrative feels broken, or when someone asks 'what's wrong with my story?'. Keywords: story, diagnosis, stuck, narrative, plot, character, worldbuilding, revision.
non-fiction-revision
Diagnose and guide revisions in non-fiction books. Use for non-fiction book revision, when arguments feel weak, evidence is outdated, readers report confusion, thesis is unclear, or book structure has problems. Keywords: non-fiction, revision, thesis, argument, evidence, structure.
novel-revision
Manage multi-level novel revisions while preventing cascade problems. Use when editing novels, when changes at one level break things at others, when you need systematic change management for long-form fiction, or when revisions keep creating new problems.
time-resource-estimator
Estimate realistic project timelines, break down hours by feature/phase, include buffer for revisions, set achievable client expectations, and avoid over-promising deadlines you can't meet.
sequential-thinking
Sequential thinking and structured problem solving. Break down complex problems into steps with revision and branching capabilities. Use for multi-step analysis, planning, and hypothesis verification.
peer-review
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
Scientific writing
Comprehensive scientific writing guidance for research papers, grants, and technical documentation. Covers paper structure (IMRAD), methods writing, results presentation, figure/table design, citation formatting, abstract writing, and revision responses. Use when users are writing scientific papers, formatting manuscripts, responding to reviewers, writing grant proposals, or need help with any aspect of scientific communication. Triggers include "write a paper," "scientific writing," "format my manuscript," "methods section," "respond to reviewers," or any research writing task.
revision-coordinator
Orchestrate manuscript revision by routing feedback to specialized writing skills
EDITOR REVISION
Prompt for Editor Eddy to revise a draft document using lexical analysis artifacts
sequential-thinking
Structured reflective problem-solving methodology. Process: decompose, analyze, hypothesize, verify, revise. Capabilities: complex problem decomposition, adaptive planning, course correction, hypothesis verification, multi-step analysis. Actions: decompose, analyze, plan, revise, verify solutions step-by-step. Keywords: sequential thinking, problem decomposition, multi-step analysis, hypothesis verification, adaptive planning, course correction, reflective thinking, step-by-step, thought sequence, dynamic adjustment, unclear scope, complex problem, structured analysis. Use when: decomposing complex problems, planning with revision capability, analyzing unclear scope, verifying hypotheses, needing course correction, solving multi-step problems.
gcp-cloud-run
Deploy serverless containers on Google Cloud Run. Build and push container images, configure auto-scaling from zero, split traffic between revisions for canary deployments, and set up custom domains with managed TLS.
docx
Word document processing. Format: .docx (ZIP/XML structure). Capabilities: create documents, edit content, tracked changes, comments, formatting preservation, text extraction, styles, headers/footers, tables, images. Actions: create, edit, analyze, extract from Word documents. Keywords: Word, docx, document, tracked changes, comments, formatting, styles, headers, footers, tables, images, paragraphs, text extraction, template, mail merge, revision history, document comparison. Use when: creating Word documents, editing docx files, working with tracked changes, adding comments, extracting document content, preserving document formatting.
buck2-target-determination
This skill should be used when determining which Buck2 targets are affected by code changes for incremental builds and tests. Use this when users ask to test/build changed code, find affected targets, or run incremental workflows with jj revisions.
Revise Report Generation
Generates structured revise reports for Epics by aggregating task comments and learnings. Use when: (1) An Epic is completed or substantially progressed, (2) You want to consolidate "Revision Learning" comments from multiple tasks, (3) You need a traceability report linking tasks to commits.
sequential-thinking
Structured, reflective problem-solving through sequential chain-of-thought reasoning. Replaces the Sequential Thinking MCP server (sequentialthinking tool). Use this skill when facing complex multi-step problems, planning and design tasks, analysis that may need course correction, debugging with iterative hypothesis testing, architectural decisions requiring trade-off evaluation, or any task where the full scope is unclear initially. Trigger on: sequential thinking, step by step reasoning, chain of thought, break down problem, think through this, structured analysis, multi-step problem solving, reflective reasoning, thought process, deep analysis, complex reasoning, hypothesis verification, branching analysis, revision-based thinking, dynamic problem solving.
sequential-thinking
Dynamic problem-solving through structured sequential thoughts. Use when breaking down complex problems, planning multi-step solutions, analyzing ambiguous requirements, debugging intricate issues, exploring design alternatives, or tackling problems where the full scope is unclear. Enables thought revision, branching, and iterative refinement.
sequential-thinking
Apply structured, reflective problem-solving for complex tasks requiring multi-step analysis, revision capability, and hypothesis verification. Use for complex problem decomposition, adaptive planning, analysis needing course correction, problems with unclear scope, multi-step solutions, and hypothesis-driven work.
sequential-thinking
Apply step-by-step analysis for complex problems with revision capability. Use for multi-step reasoning, hypothesis verification, adaptive planning, problem decomposition, course correction.
plan-approval
Plan-approval workflow patterns for user control over AI actions in Claude Code Waypoint Plugin. Use when planning complex changes, need user approval before execution, want to prevent mistakes, or need to document proposed changes. Covers plan creation, approval checkpoints, plan deviation tracking, revision management, and learning from approved/rejected plans.
pr-review-comments
Fetch and analyze GitHub PR review comments and code-level feedback using the prc CLI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions PR comments, PR feedback, reviewer feedback, review comments, addressing reviews, fixing PR issues, checking what reviewers said, loading PR context, or working on PR revisions. Accepts PR numbers (auto-detects repo), PR URLs, or owner/repo format.
devil's-advocate
Challenge research assumptions and identify weaknesses in arguments. Stress-test papers before submission or revision.
devils-advocate
Challenge research assumptions and identify weaknesses in arguments. Stress-test papers before submission or revision.
devils-advocate
Challenge research assumptions and identify weaknesses in arguments. Stress-test papers before submission or revision.
evaluation-to-growth
Systematic content evaluation framework progressing through Critique → Reinforcement → Risk Analysis → Growth. Use when reviewing writing, arguments, proposals, code documentation, or any content requiring rigorous multi-dimensional assessment. Supports interactive guided mode or autonomous full-report mode, with output as markdown report, structured checklist, or inline revision suggestions. Triggers on requests to evaluate, critique, improve, strengthen, or review content quality.
design-training-program
Design a GxP training programme covering training needs analysis by role, curriculum design (regulatory awareness, system-specific, data integrity), competency assessment criteria, training record retention, and retraining triggers for SOP revisions and incidents. Use when a new validated system requires user training before go-live, an audit finding cites inadequate training, organisational changes introduce new roles, a periodic programme review is due, or inspection preparation requires demonstrating training adequacy.
write-standard-operating-procedure
Write a GxP-compliant Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). Covers regulatory SOP template structure (purpose, scope, definitions, responsibilities, procedure, references, revision history), approval workflow design, periodic review scheduling, and operational procedures for system use. Use when a new validated system requires operational procedures, when existing informal procedures need formalisation, when an audit finding cites missing procedures, when a change control triggers SOP updates, or when periodic review identifies outdated procedural content.
creative-writing-craft
Craft compelling fiction and creative nonfiction with attention to structure, voice, prose style, and revision. Supports short stories, novel chapters, essays, and hybrid forms. Triggers on creative writing, fiction writing, story craft, prose style, or literary technique requests.
design-training-program
Design a GxP training programme covering training needs analysis by role, curriculum design (regulatory awareness, system-specific, data integrity), competency assessment criteria, training record retention, and retraining triggers for SOP revisions and incidents. Use when a new validated system requires user training before go-live, an audit finding cites inadequate training, organisational changes introduce new roles, a periodic programme review is due, or inspection preparation requires demonstrating training adequacy.
write-standard-operating-procedure
Write a GxP-compliant Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). Covers regulatory SOP template structure (purpose, scope, definitions, responsibilities, procedure, references, revision history), approval workflow design, periodic review scheduling, and operational procedures for system use. Use when a new validated system requires operational procedures, when existing informal procedures need formalisation, when an audit finding cites missing procedures, when a change control triggers SOP updates, or when periodic review identifies outdated procedural content.