Verify claims in pitch decks and founder statements using multiple independent sources. Use when analyzing any claim about market size, traction, team background, or competitive positioning.
When analyzing claims from pitch decks, founder statements, or company materials, follow this rigorous verification process.
Assign one of these confidence levels to every claim:
| Level | Definition | Requirements | |-------|------------|--------------| | VERIFIED | Confirmed via 2+ independent sources | Multiple credible sources agree | | PARTIALLY VERIFIED | Some evidence supports, gaps remain | One credible source + logical consistency | | UNVERIFIED | Cannot confirm with available data | No independent sources found | | CONTRADICTED | Evidence conflicts with claim | Sources disagree with stated claim |
Extract the specific, testable assertion:
Never rely solely on company-provided materials. Seek:
Compare across sources:
For each verified claim, record:
{
"claim": "The specific claim text",
"confidence": "VERIFIED | PARTIALLY VERIFIED | UNVERIFIED | CONTRADICTED",
"sources": [
{"name": "Source name", "url": "URL if available", "date": "YYYY-MM-DD"}
],
"notes": "Any caveats or context"
}
Watch for these warning signs:
Include a verification summary in your analysis:
{
"verification_summary": {
"total_claims_analyzed": 15,
"verified": 8,
"partially_verified": 4,
"unverified": 2,
"contradicted": 1
},
"key_concerns": [
"Market size claim contradicted by industry reports",
"Founder employment dates don't match LinkedIn"
]
}
Category:business