Multi-perspective UX review combining usability, accessibility, and interaction design analysis.
Comprehensive user experience review that coordinates usability, accessibility, and interaction design perspectives for thorough analysis of components, flows, or features.
ui-design-aesthetics insteadAnswer these questions before reviewing:
Evaluate the interface against each heuristic:
| Heuristic | Check | |-----------|-------| | Visibility of system status | Does the user always know what's happening? | | Match with real world | Does it use familiar language and concepts? | | User control and freedom | Can users undo, go back, escape? | | Consistency and standards | Does it follow platform conventions? | | Error prevention | Are mistakes prevented before they happen? | | Recognition over recall | Is information visible rather than memorized? | | Flexibility and efficiency | Are there shortcuts for expert users? | | Aesthetic and minimalist design | Is every element necessary? | | Error recovery | Are error messages helpful and actionable? | | Help and documentation | Is guidance available when needed? |
<!-- Example: Accessible button with proper ARIA -->
<button aria-label="Close dialog" aria-describedby="close-hint">
<svg aria-hidden="true"><!-- icon --></svg>
</button>
<span id="close-hint" class="sr-only">Press Escape to close</span>
Categorize every finding:
| Priority | Criteria | Action | |----------|----------|--------| | Critical | Blocks usability or fails WCAG AA | Must fix before release | | High | Significantly degrades experience | Fix in current sprint | | Enhancement | Improves delight and efficiency | Backlog for next iteration | | Future | Long-term improvements | Track in roadmap |
## UX Review: [Component/Flow Name]
### Summary
[2-3 sentence executive summary]
### Critical Issues
- [ ] Issue 1: [Description, impact, WCAG criterion if applicable]
- [ ] Issue 2: [Description, impact]
### Recommendations by Category
#### Usability
| Finding | Impact | Recommendation |
|---------|--------|----------------|
| [Issue] | High/Med/Low | [Fix] |
#### Accessibility
| Finding | WCAG Criterion | Recommendation |
|---------|----------------|----------------|
| [Issue] | [2.x.x Level] | [Fix] |
#### Interaction Design
| Finding | Impact | Recommendation |
|---------|--------|----------------|
| [Issue] | High/Med/Low | [Fix] |
### Next Steps
1. Create issues for critical findings
2. Add accessibility requirements to acceptance criteria
3. Schedule follow-up review after fixes
Use --focus to narrow the review scope:
--focus=ux: User flow mapping, task efficiency, error recovery, learnability--focus=a11y: WCAG 2.1 AA audit, keyboard nav, screen reader, contrast, focus management--focus=interaction: State coverage, feedback timing, micro-interactions, animation reviewGoogle Workspace CLI for Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Contacts, Sheets, and Docs.
Manage Apple Notes via the `memo` CLI on macOS (create, view, edit, delete, search, move, and export notes). Use when a user asks OpenClaw to add a note, list notes, search notes, or manage note folders.
Work with Obsidian vaults (plain Markdown notes) and automate via obsidian-cli.
Use when you need to control Slack from OpenClaw via the slack tool, including reacting to messages or pinning/unpinning items in Slack channels or DMs.
Manage Apple Reminders via remindctl CLI (list, add, edit, complete, delete). Supports lists, date filters, and JSON/plain output.
Manage Trello boards, lists, and cards via the Trello REST API.
Category:productivity