Review web design for layout quality, typography, colour usage, spacing, responsive behaviour, brand consistency, and visual hierarchy. Covers design principles evaluation and improvement recommendations. Use when reviewing a design mockup before development, assessing an implemented site for design quality, providing feedback during a design review session, evaluating brand consistency, or checking responsive behaviour across breakpoints.
Evaluate a web design for visual quality, consistency, and effectiveness across devices.
Visual hierarchy guides the user's eye through content in order of importance.
## Visual Hierarchy Assessment
| Page/Section | Focal Point | Hierarchy Clear? | Issues |
|-------------|-------------|-----------------|--------|
| Homepage | Hero section CTA | Yes | Secondary CTA competes with primary |
| Product page | Product image | Mostly | Price not prominent enough |
| Contact form | Submit button | No | Form title same size as body text |
Expected: Each major page/section assessed for clear visual hierarchy. On failure: If mockups are unavailable, assess from live code using browser dev tools.
/* Example well-structured type scale (1.25 ratio) */
:root {
--text-xs: 0.64rem; /* 10.24px */
--text-sm: 0.8rem; /* 12.8px */
--text-base: 1rem; /* 16px */
--text-lg: 1.25rem; /* 20px */
--text-xl: 1.563rem; /* 25px */
--text-2xl: 1.953rem; /* 31.25px */
--text-3xl: 2.441rem; /* 39.06px */
}
Expected: Typography assessed for consistency, readability, and hierarchy. On failure: If the design uses more than 3 font families, recommend consolidation.
## Colour Assessment
| Usage | Colour | Contrast Ratio | WCAG AA | Notes |
|-------|--------|----------------|---------|-------|
| Body text on white | #333333 | 12.6:1 | Pass | Good |
| Link text on white | #2563eb | 5.2:1 | Pass | Good |
| Muted text on light gray | #9ca3af on #f3f4f6 | 2.1:1 | FAIL | Increase contrast |
| CTA button text | #ffffff on #22c55e | 3.1:1 | FAIL for small text | Use darker green or larger text |
Expected: Colour palette reviewed for coherence, accessibility, and semantic consistency. On failure: Use a contrast checker tool (WebAIM) to verify exact ratios.
Spacing audit:
## Spacing Consistency Check
| Element Pair | Expected Gap | Actual Gap | Consistent? |
|-------------|-------------|------------|-------------|
| Section title to content | 24px | 24px | Yes |
| Card to card | 16px | 16px/24px | No — inconsistent |
| Form label to input | 8px | 4px/8px/12px | No — varies |
Expected: Layout uses a systematic grid and spacing scale consistently.
On failure: If spacing is inconsistent, recommend adopting a spacing scale (e.g., Tailwind's space-*).
Test across key breakpoints:
| Breakpoint | Width | Represents | |---|---|---| | Mobile | 375px | iPhone SE / small phones | | Mobile L | 428px | iPhone 14 / large phones | | Tablet | 768px | iPad portrait | | Desktop | 1280px | Standard laptop | | Wide | 1536px+ | Desktop monitor |
Check at each breakpoint:
## Responsive Review
| Breakpoint | Layout | Touch Targets | Text | Images | Navigation | Issues |
|-----------|--------|---------------|------|--------|------------|--------|
| 375px | OK | OK | OK | Overflow on hero | Hamburger | Hero image clips |
| 768px | OK | OK | OK | OK | Hamburger | None |
| 1280px | OK | N/A | OK | OK | Full nav | None |
| 1536px | OK | N/A | Line length too long | OK | Full nav | Add max-width to content |
Expected: Design tested at all key breakpoints with issues documented. On failure: If responsive testing tools are unavailable, review CSS media queries for coverage.
Expected: Brand elements verified against guidelines with specific deviations noted. On failure: If brand guidelines don't exist, note this as a recommendation and assess internal consistency instead.
## Web Design Review
### Overall Impression
[2-3 sentences: overall quality, strongest and weakest aspects]
### Visual Hierarchy: [Score/5]
[Key findings with specific references]
### Typography: [Score/5]
[Key findings with specific references]
### Colour: [Score/5]
[Key findings with specific references]
### Layout & Spacing: [Score/5]
[Key findings with specific references]
### Responsive Design: [Score/5]
[Key findings with specific references]
### Brand Consistency: [Score/5]
[Key findings with specific references]
### Priority Improvements
1. [Most impactful change — specific and actionable]
2. [Second priority]
3. [Third priority]
### Positive Notes
1. [What works well and should be preserved]
Expected: Review provides specific, visual-reference feedback with prioritized improvements. On failure: If scoring feels arbitrary, use a simpler pass/concern/fail system instead.
review-ux-ui — usability, interaction patterns, and accessibility (complementary to visual design)setup-tailwind-typescript — Tailwind CSS implementation for design systemsscaffold-nextjs-app — Next.js application scaffoldingEdit PDFs with natural-language instructions using the nano-pdf CLI.
Control Sonos speakers (discover/status/play/volume/group).
Terminal Spotify playback/search via spogo (preferred) or spotify_player.
Capture frames or clips from RTSP/ONVIF cameras.
CLI to manage emails via IMAP/SMTP. Use `himalaya` to list, read, write, reply, forward, search, and organize emails from the terminal. Supports multiple accounts and message composition with MML (MIME Meta Language).
Monitor blogs and RSS/Atom feeds for updates using the blogwatcher CLI.
Category:tools